From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: 3 bugs in Rmail
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:25:39 -0500
Message-ID: <yyxk4iac9v0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8362twk3js.fsf@gnu.org> <871v4kzfvs.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<jwvlj2sjvs3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294853480 13781 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2011 17:31:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:31:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 12 18:31:15 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pd4XQ-0007qD-RN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:31:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36176 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Pd4XN-00073U-9O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:31:09 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34385 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pd4XB-0006wS-0R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:31:00 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cyd@gnu.org>) id 1Pd4S6-0005oq-Vr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:25:44 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52009)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cyd@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pd4S6-0005ol-Sv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:25:42 -0500
Original-Received: from cyd by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <cyd@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pd4S3-0007vF-20; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:25:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <jwvlj2sjvs3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message
	of "Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:28:05 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.91 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134466
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/134466>

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> Maybe rather than mail-bury-function, it could be
> a mail-callback-function, i.e. not meant explicitly for burying but more
> generally for returning to the caller.  I guess the difference would be
> only in the name, tho.

In either case, this probably involves the non-backward compatible
change of adding a new arg to compose-mail and the subsequent
composition functions.

So, my plan is to add the hack from mail-bury to message-bury on the
emacs-23 branch, then work on the cleaner solution on the trunk.