From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: split up process.c Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d3ux7ris.fsf@gnu.org> <83lj9lbtka.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278725726 14590 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2010 01:35:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 10 03:35:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXOyP-0005Qh-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:35:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39952 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXOyP-0004Yr-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51387 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXOyK-0004Xx-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OXOyJ-00042V-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48577) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OXOyJ-00042Q-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXOyJ-0007fM-Jx; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:35:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri\, 09 Jul 2010 19\:01\:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126979 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > >> There's already a precedent for multiple implementations for the >> same function: all of x_* > > If you are talking about the platform-specific implementations of > x-create-frame, etc, that causes problems, and it is a stated goal to I am talking about the platform specific C functions, not DEFUNs I am aware of the problems cause be DEFUNs.