From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6031: Emacs 23.1 breaks with gcc 4.5 and -foptimize-sibling-calls Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:09:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <19413.62676.577829.840345@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272317145 11821 80.91.229.12 (26 Apr 2010 21:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6031@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 26 23:25:43 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6VoF-0000Hn-4p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:25:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6VoE-0007j1-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6Vo9-0007ik-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40136 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6Vo8-0007iP-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6Vo7-0008El-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6Vo6-0008Eb-Vl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6VZ7-0003kg-Qv; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:10:05 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:10:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6031 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6031-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6031.127231617414400 (code B ref 6031); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:10:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6031) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2010 21:09:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6VYb-0003kD-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6VYZ-0003k6-SJ for 6031@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6VYV-0007Y3-Ja; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:09:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19413.62676.577829.840345@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Mon\, 26 Apr 2010 22\:17\:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:10:05 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36534 Archived-At: Ulrich Mueller writes: > I just want to point out that we observe a very similar issue in > , for the 23.1 release. Could you please try to find out where exactly the problem is? You can do a binary search on the object files compiled with the options that result in a working binary by linking them with the ones that result in a non-working binary. Maybe you can find a single file that gets miscompiled, and then find out what function in that file gets miscompiled.