Re: Trunk bootstrap failure [Cygwin]

[Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>]

Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi@alice.it> writes:

> Il 06/07/2010 4.29, Dan Nicolaescu ha scritto:
>> Angelo Graziosi<angelo.graziosi@alice.it>  writes:
>>
>>> Current trunk (rev. 100729) fails to bootstrap on Cygwin in this way:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> gcc -c -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I. -I/tmp/emacs/src   -D_REENTRANT
>>> -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
>>> -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
>>> -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
>>> -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1
>>> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12
>>> -I/usr/include/freetype2     -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/librsvg-2
>>> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
>>> -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1
>>> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12
>>> -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include   -DORBIT2=1
>>> -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0
>>> -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include
>>> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   -g -O2
>>> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign       -MMD -MF
>>> deps/ecrt0.d /tmp/emacs/src/ecrt0.c
>>> /tmp/emacs/src/ecrt0.c: In function ‘_start’:
>>> /tmp/emacs/src/ecrt0.c:74: error: too few arguments to function ‘start1’
>>> make[2]: *** [ecrt0.o] Error 1
>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/emacs/build/src'
>>> make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/emacs/build'
>>> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
>>>
>>> The bootstrap I did on 01 July (rev. 100669) was fine.
>>
>> I reverted the conversion to standard C for ecrt0.c, it should be fine now.
>> cygwin is the only user for ecrt0.c
>> Can you please experiment changing
>> START_FILES='ecrt0.o'
>> to either:
>> START_FILES='pre-crt0.o'
>> or
>> START_FILES=
>> in emacs/configure
>> and see if any of those work?
>
> Both solutions, you suggest, fail.

Thanks.  Oh, well, someone would have to look at the details of the
cygwin build to figure out if this can be really done...