From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10164: 24.0.91; Instant crash enabling linum-mode Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4ED58F60.4000604@code-affinity.com> <83bort60k0.fsf@gnu.org> <8762i13766.fsf@gnu.org> <838vmx5z28.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkfd4g6w.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322679372 32691 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2011 18:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10164@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 19:56:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK8-0003oI-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:56:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK8-0001SA-6s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK2-0001Rl-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK2-0000U8-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK1-0000U4-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpK6-0007CZ-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10164 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10164-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10164.132267932427637 (code B ref 10164); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2011 18:55:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpJU-0007Bh-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpJR-0007BZ-QP for 10164@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:22 -0500 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVpJM-0002I7-V2; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83zkfd4g6w.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:29:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:56:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54510 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Dan Nicolaescu >> Cc: eliz@gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:10:47 -0500 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > I'm amazed that this assertion didn't trigger until now. I guess too >> > few people compile with asserts. >> >> You might want to add another option: >> configure --enable-checking=xasserts >> >> to enable asserts, it's easier to enable checks when one does not have >> to edit files. > > I thought that's what "configure --enable-asserts" did. Doesn't it? > Or is that option inconvenient in some way? I just didn't know about it...