From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: usefulness of NO_ARGS_ARRAY Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271440134 21620 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2010 17:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 16 19:48:52 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2peu-0000AN-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:48:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53333 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2pes-0008Ag-Uf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2pd2-0006Qy-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34234 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2pd0-0006OS-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O2pcz-0007f7-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:34159) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O2pcz-0007f3-3S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2pcy-0003hI-AT; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:46:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri\, 16 Apr 2010 11\:33\:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123768 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> NO_ARGS_ARRAY assumes that function arguments are passed on the stack, > > ITYM !NO_ARG_ARRAY. Exactly. >> Do we still want to keep NO_ARGS_ARRAY? > > IMHO it should always be defined and consequently removed. That's what I want to do, I'll do that in a week or so if there's no objection until then.