From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updating *vc-dir* marks from *VC-log* Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:06:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <19688.28312.768696.349949@rgr.rgrjr.com> <19689.17740.876119.178798@rgr.rgrjr.com> <19689.25905.829852.432969@rgr.rgrjr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290532201 25007 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 17:10:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bob Rogers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 18:09:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwNQ-00006n-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:09:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKwNQ-0007bg-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:09:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51657 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKwK5-0005Af-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:06:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwJr-0001fN-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:06:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:41297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwJr-0001fI-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwJp-0003Gy-Al; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:06:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <19689.25905.829852.432969@rgr.rgrjr.com> (Bob Rogers's message of "Sun\, 21 Nov 2010 13\:30\:09 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133064 Archived-At: Bob Rogers writes: > All true. But Stefan pointed out in response to bug#7350 that C-c C-c > should at least bring it to the user's attention if those two sets > differ, and update the commit fileset if the use approves. > > But if you've already have that code in your local copy, then I don't > have to write it. Right? Don't hold your breath, I mostly gave up on checking in my VC changes, the overhead is just not worth it.