From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10169: a simple interrupt evokes abort?! (but only with (require 'saveplace)) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:46:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4ED7A551.5080803@cs.ucla.edu> <871uso6zjh.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <1bliqwtb8h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <82aa7cyv5z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322952472 14593 80.91.229.12 (3 Dec 2011 22:47:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 22:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , 10169@debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Meyering To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 23:47:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyN1-0004Y2-Cy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyN0-0005uP-Oi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyMv-0005uA-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyMt-0007VD-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyMt-0007V6-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyNF-00063w-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:48:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10169 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10169-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10169.132295243923252 (code B ref 10169); Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10169) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2011 22:47:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyMZ-00062z-10 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyMW-00062s-T0 for 10169@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:47:17 -0500 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWyM8-0004qd-Ty; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:46:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:23:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:48:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54662 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> How does that that justify introducing another severe bug: can't kill >> emacs using C-c (as it has always been possible ? > > C-c in an interactive shell doesn't kill it either. What's the similarity between emacs as an X11 application and an interactive shell? And again, how do you justify changing a long time behavior?