From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20702: 25.0.50; (elisp) `ImageMagick Images': say how to tell if Emacs has IM support, etc. Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 19:39:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4763e124-1d2c-465e-9034-6faa609b8133@default> <83iob8u32e.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9qstx1j.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv6ctwaz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433115623 25624 80.91.229.3 (31 May 2015 23:40:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 23:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20702@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 01 01:40:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpu-00004x-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 01:40:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpu-0006Jg-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpq-0006HU-N5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpq-00010l-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpp-00010Q-Vk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCpo-0003g7-Pk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:40:05 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 23:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20702.143311556114080 (code B ref 20702); Sun, 31 May 2015 23:40:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2015 23:39:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCp6-0003f1-7c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:51700 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCp3-0003er-Eg for 20702@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzCp2-0004YD-2o; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:39:16 -0400 X-Spook: data haven morse ANDVT Sundevil spy Panama jihad broadside X-Ran: lJ9,*w>_77|vC_dm~BF+@E9H'ooe.\[Ect5Z#3%k;0E>;FGSR6H;pg*#1O))i;:<7RC,<+ X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83fv6ctwaz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 31 May 2015 21:51:32 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103416 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Maybe you meant the value should not be examined by Lisp programs. In > which case I might agree: I was talking about humans examining the > value, not programs. Yeah, I meant Lisp programs.