From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default lexical-binding to t Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:07:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wmhjjq1r.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7301"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Richard Stallman , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Drew Adams To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 00:08:35 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t9BcB-0001mL-HZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9BbU-00083K-Rb; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:07:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9BbS-00082v-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9BbQ-00040h-Fq; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:07:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=llq+hxNjxCTkOZkspSzM2C8x0uBiEveowFV3ekhostQ=; b=Zz2+zXWcksFL6Katei4V zhcs/Cf/6HoRJ9v1mTbT+ejooFx7QfY24JdPHxexdV6M8UQiyoYT2bPCxA3WIpXofMq+YQPeFVygU NI7ID8qLSVb+LIVc4rvBCKNcWlBSCU25kQ7ToT/S3Creg9FzrvdAsnt9bDr7XkVL3bJHXOPEbssU+ 3WbIEr0RB+uqdczzH6pqX97ckB/Wwi680BurNPpDEExuw1CBGIJA2FuNYaaIp+D93sbm+TRx2oAZe Ya7tsdXxFjBd0lXS9tjXZRev7HWXkTFBhPEzU+9IzUB+e8Yxfh2bq26YIBEkASOvn4lQ772ykJwwI SGSQ4ebPrCcYRg==; Original-Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9BbP-0000bO-GP; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:07:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wmhjjq1r.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:39:44 +0800") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325245 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> It seems that people are forming ideas of how frequent dynamic binding >> files are by looking at code in active development. Of course it is >> rare there. But user have a lot of old Lisp files that they haven't >> used for a while. Some of them, someone will try to use someday. > > It is far too early even to arrive at this conclusion. I have said it > before and I'll say it again. Even actively developed packages on the > EmacsWiki are still to be amended with lexical binding directives. > > https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/info%2b.el > (Last updated Mon Jan 29 15:53:30 2024 (-0800)) Drew replied in this thread the following: > +1. > > FWIW, I have no problem adding a `lexical-binding: nil' > cookie to my libraries that haven't yet been converted > to use `lexical-binding: t'. > > (Ultimately I hope to convert all to `lexical-binding: > t', but in some cases that could take a while.) Po Lu I'd be curious to know if you have other examples. Regards Andrea