From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:37:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87y0ztc27x.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87r05jagqq.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877c7bk9ov.fsf@protonmail.com> <875xmt9ihs.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <871pxehguf.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32618"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, 57789@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Rob Browning To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 11:38:11 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRy-0008IF-FG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 11:38:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRs-0008In-Sa; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:38:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRr-0008Ic-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRq-0002pB-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:38:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=E+xVjLXZfMwUmeMJ7Yg17fmr/Mt/GRgYAByDpliXcGM=; b=H3ARmDxdYIsG/bcHwxYEeo4gjYMCV0ngSqhDtQIB5QW2X6e5a1zgMfNUZOisbZynmBU23AIODhTXLG1xsfy3w6ZDetifYCIzzc7qai2bBXgGcpIiM/yBpccqgW/77SPCUi6+ZkbMQhJo6/XlrZP3A4B9arFsvN/rVfO/UZAOomiy9QMcf1kP7BBYSsQFPjgH3hggeBHKvwjHA73kvhRZdQuCPKZo1fk8sNrtxOT4T8vM2P5kNsMhtEAs8u4CdLPO/UeEVeCfgVp0/m/oDbN3xHRRUCsxOlJLudng3PibRvmeNz4VB5RxZ/rRIb0arSsgpdxk8r0LE62hOhoma8kHew==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRq-0003U9-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 10:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.173633266813370 (code B ref 57789); Wed, 08 Jan 2025 10:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2025 10:37:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRb-0003Ta-NN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:37:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRZ-0003TL-O5 for 57789@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRU-0002la-9m; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:37:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=E+xVjLXZfMwUmeMJ7Yg17fmr/Mt/GRgYAByDpliXcGM=; b=WXp2iqiPtwF187R+1nT7 /xcWDSqoYqeTB+/SeNgDIVKxqBHU1I7BfcmnjWyC5habICefu3/v1hSH1MmUIT9j698UNEjtSxIZG NfnNrkvp2NjbDdl2haw8JPrd5Iqaa967qiTZ9N28O2p0K2k1G4akRcCn8Gzk9AP1iOQZiHTHnJ9e4 SvppuVqhCp24X3wLUw49w6d/ZUXs0jkFhb/nmtTziHW/PzUvruIBlPGmFaJn2PBU6id8fB4RTe0ix khM5W9EsV7kAqJWWxEHSgcxFVbPfMZ5oF3Umd2nXq38ipVsJd2G7tZLNAE3PIJbQtR3D7/hQgtEmh pWBqn/nnc/CNvw==; Original-Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVTRQ-0004Uj-KQ; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:37:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871pxehguf.fsf@protonmail.com> (Pip Cet's message of "Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:51:56 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298768 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: > "Rob Browning" writes: > >> Pip Cet writes: >> >>> Same compiler? Is ASLR in use? >> >> Should be roughly the same compiler, both are building a "current" >> unstable tree, and I build the one on zelenka a few days ago and the >> mmdebstrap one the day before yesterday. Not sure offhand wrt ASLR. > > Hmm. Is there any way for you to share the binaries that don't work? > It would be interesting to see whether the binary that crashes on > silicon works in the emulator. > >>> In any case, I'm always interested in weird machines, even if they're >>> virtual, so I'd appreciate such instructions. >> >> OK, so if you have access to a Debian host with recent enough versions >> (fwiw, I was likely using trixie (testing) versions of debvm and >> mmdebstrap), this should work. > > Thank you very much! The instructions worked for me! > > I could build Emacs, but, as expected, there was no crash. > > It's still possible that __builtin_unwind_init was buggy in one GCC > version but not the other Yep that's possible, but I had the impression that GCC middle-end was (probably still is) buggy since forever on that =F0=9F=A4=B7