From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: optimized build Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 04:16:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38219"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Emacs Devel , Eli Zaretskii , Helmut Eller To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 10:17:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s3X3T-0009dK-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 10:17:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3X2b-0005HS-V0; Sun, 05 May 2024 04:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3X2Y-0005H4-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 04:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3X2Y-0002pL-0O; Sun, 05 May 2024 04:16:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=ngUI9AJo0SdNDOgyukRg2kNk5RqPY6lOW3jGbaGbO3U=; b=bShgzZxYuntUwhOZS7ek WNw8gfUkKetJVdUFd/EnlBh2FLM1GHDgcMyW14U5p3HSGKuc6ox1c0wcWgC2WG2B2ieB6+YpQqxLW hvGVq8FqYaHiEgCNf+0851meUUC0BBY9qAKxOJe2NFklLBMB2AHnVt3aaMm6lJD8DYm+nh9zWDq9/ 7A8hO9xlqtBcvMeKMn//3K9x8jmbr/Fu8zN+ixYuKfrYACJc1OK6xlLfUPMhQqF8e3qNPuQBHavbG qtLd++8PX0UXtmFYos2MoeaJi2QB70mNllO4p6zfgJTJd3bja8KK4+P9sHcPiFSTd9bmbSQcVLHmA 3O0MzNYPzshQLw==; Original-Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3X2W-0004Gt-EM; Sun, 05 May 2024 04:16:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: ("Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llman?= =?utf-8?Q?n=22's?= message of "Sun, 05 May 2024 10:05:16 +0200") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318791 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> If you are there you might want to have a run with elisp-benchmarks [1]. >> IIRC one or two were GC bounded so we might see some difference =F0=9F= =98=83. > > I'd rather leave that to someone else. > > I'm only interested in user experience, hard figures could only get in > the way :-). I agree with you, problem is user experience is often difficult to quantify ;) Andrea