From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:13:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20181214225253.GM2244@macbook.localdomain> <83h8ffff6o.fsf@gnu.org> <20181215103217.GO2244@macbook.localdomain> <1l4lbe4r24.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <835zvufvwf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545074221 16842 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2018 19:17:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: dr.khaled.hosny@gmail.com, behdad@behdad.org, 33748@debbugs.gnu.org, far.nasiri.m@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 20:16:56 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyNr-0004Fw-MP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:16:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyPy-0005g2-8T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyMB-0003Io-CT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyM6-0002CB-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyM2-00028h-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyM2-0007yh-3A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33748 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33748-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33748.154507404830580 (code B ref 33748); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33748) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2018 19:14:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyL8-0007x8-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyL6-0007wX-0m for 33748@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyL0-0001Gb-DD for 33748@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyKu-0001B9-SE; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyKp-00041l-6I; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:13:48 -0500 X-Spook: Recruitment Crash MDA covert video Tuberculosis First X-Ran: "vMAV99&O\-e|"o3((n\&(iE7lRBDRDHXo7d8I*qdlN4t9F{Ve.tJE"PlT-B!HtCR.em[Q X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <835zvufvwf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:10:56 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153527 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The last part, in my interpretation, means 0.9.42 is "good enough", > since it has the APIs used by the code. I feel like I'm flogging a dead horse, but to me there's a difference between "good enough" and "the minimum version that we want to support going forward". Is anyone going to be testing 0.9.42 on a regular basis? It looks 0.9.42 and 1.0 were released on the same day, so requiring the former instead of the latter makes little sense to me. Debian stable has 1.4.2, RHEL 7 has 1.7.5, Ubuntu 16.04 has 1.0.1, Ubuntu 18.04 has 1.7.2. So personally I would set the minimum to 1.4.2 (Jan 2017). And that's all I have to say about that. :)