From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:02:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pq98u3h8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5nvswfs.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5ntzt5v.fsf@gnu.org> <831ul7ci2f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340586195 22643 80.91.229.3 (25 Jun 2012 01:03:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:03:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 11657-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 25 03:03:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixhy-0003Nn-6E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:03:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixhy-0007I7-6m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixhv-0007I2-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixhu-0000Ww-73 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixhu-0000Wl-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixld-0007lE-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:07:01 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 11657 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 11657@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 11657-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D11657.134058639029791 (code D ref 11657); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11657-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2012 01:06:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixl7-0007kS-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sixl5-0007kL-QW for 11657-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SixhK-0006yB-Nb; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:02:34 -0400 X-Spook: keyhole Al Jazeera satellite imagery Defcon 22nd SAS X-Ran: 0FLmv!td,mOc5oQGi:[o/SL.osc~m5}"K~DY`WEeaU3>DA1,^bzUIir$,z.@lt%X-dWdIm X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <831ul7ci2f.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:33:44 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61266 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks, I think this bug report can be closed now. As a general comment, whever you find yourself saying that, I suggest you just do it instead (particularly when you are the OP, like now). It's easy to undo; and otherwise I think things are likely to get left open when they needn't be.