From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Need help with upstream vs Debian emacs-23.4 build differences Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1340924981.32095.176.camel@hp.my.own.domain> <1340956879.32095.215.camel@hp.my.own.domain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341203466 18351 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2012 04:31:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: svante.signell@telia.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 02 06:31:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHw-000855-Ll for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 06:31:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHv-0005pJ-LY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHs-0005pA-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHr-0005cf-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHr-0005ca-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlYHo-0007io-Ju; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:30:56 -0400 X-Spook: dictionary Taiwan embassy ASO sniper Telex NORAD Tony X-Ran: (<)-tZ)]j%{232d0J]zRC2)(6!'g'OJHuL%I^?=(o):0j->*[% X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 01 Jul 2012 20:44:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151344 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > IIUC, Debian includes several patches to the Emacs sources. Come to think of it, this may explain at least some of the things you are seeing with the loaddefs files. Patching lisp files will cause the timestamp of the loaddefs files to be out-of-date, and require them to be regenerated. It should work, but it's not really an expected situation.