From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Koppelman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Should we relax requirement from gtk 2.6 to gtk 2.4. Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:33:22 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189031637 8160 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 22:33:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:33:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 00:33:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IT3RX-0004u2-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:33:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT3RV-0007H0-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT3RQ-0007FG-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT3RP-0007BW-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT3RO-0007BJ-RE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu ([130.39.223.98]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT3RO-0001aN-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE52835B for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:33:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ece.lsu.edu Original-Received: from ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tU-Yngw8jVZR for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:33:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from nested (nested.ece.lsu.edu [130.39.222.143]) by ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E328351 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:33:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from nested (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nested (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l85MXMcb031574 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:33:22 -0500 Original-Received: (from koppel@localhost) by nested (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l85MXMR0031571; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:33:22 -0500 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77911 Archived-At: Recently Emacs changed the gtk version from 2.4? to 2.6, perhaps to accommodate a use of gtk_image_new_from_icon_name and gtk_image_set_from_icon_name. If that's all, then perhaps it would be better to use 2.4-compatible functions to do the same thing.