From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:38:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <83tys2fbxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbo1iubm.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <83ljddg0w9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BAE867D.3030404@gmail.com> <4BAE9ED4.6070900@t-online.de> <87tys12sdy.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6h9rsuc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83bpe4zy13.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270031965 14989 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2010 10:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 12:39:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwvKO-0007nQ-9D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:39:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35617 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwvKM-0000Mx-TW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwvKE-0000Ms-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52171 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwvKC-0000Mf-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwvKA-0005iO-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:51078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwvKA-0005iJ-P0; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so578738bwz.26 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:39:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=PT9AUEc7u1Mk8ZfAfqerqaAizTAaAMrPzEFhQssxz+E=; b=CSkJYvC9oJjdTwrlFpGIh0qSY6aByziNKT8mITE9iRoJ7qj2WHyLQyQFMQrtTB9Tjv ukC4E+yqPuOns1LTsh6AAKCeyH/Bs0sJZBG7C53hG0DHooGfz4PUHZZ/c2xVt0vGLd5i Ov/1bQCoibSH3LE1i0S8NIE/1hy6KOhjKdofo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=FRuX9yh1PT/xs9fF2585TqMkPp21DCQdBLEwPtBYDDd8AK+O1q3B6VoRyq5hIyruTy epotXYdFN4YddfqhZBPKrLhQeWyoh/BUoZZAf/qxy64bvT5nIg5DQvmVOx5qrOwfUHdw 3dSk1NMkp6IDVo8NJGgMd+ZTbC+t2IJjZUOWI= Original-Received: by 10.204.156.9 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bpe4zy13.fsf@gnu.org> Original-Received: by 10.204.45.231 with SMTP id g39mr224326bkf.102.1270031941381; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:39:01 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122964 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I fail to see how these #ifdefs should be more annoying than similar > ones for Posix systems. Ah. Because they are *not* for Posix systems, you know. Juanma