From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11837: 24.1.50; *Compile-Log* Error: Don't know how to compile nil Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:24:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120702022125.GB904@smoon> <1pbojxsqsk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874npo8xd6.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341354331 14560 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2012 22:25:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Vladimir Lomov , 11837@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 04 00:25:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBXB-0002oT-Sm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:25:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBXA-00033B-Ss for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBX7-00031i-3a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBX5-0007XX-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:25:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBX4-0007XF-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBbd-0007QW-Ur for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:30:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20120702022125.GB904@smoon> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11837.134135457728487 (code B ref 11837); Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2012 22:29:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBbE-0007PP-90 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBbC-0007PF-C4 for 11837@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:29:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmBWa-0002i3-Sy; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:24:49 -0400 X-Spook: Rand Corporation Osama JSOFC3IP Kosovo Verisign codes KGB X-Ran: 4Hf#FI932}A!x4fiqis'<:i33$/FIa2+_\`n3QVwu=~.=WDRX\5GK-Cr X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61552 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn wrote: > Good catch. I've fixed that in AUCTeX CVS. It hasn't shown up in http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/auctex/auctex/font-latex.el?view=log for me yet, so I don't know what change you made, but you could probably just remove the associated code entirely, since it seems no one ever noticed it was doing nothing, so this can't be an area that is noticeably slow and in need of byte-compilation tricks. > I think, it's time for a new AUCTeX release. 11.86 is already 4 > years old... Then you could fix http://debbugs.gnu.org/10584 :) Isn't it "only" 2 years though? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2010-02/msg00012.html