From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: akrl--- via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46116: Acknowledgement (28.0.50; Ticking articles fails on Emacs 28 pgtk build) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:37:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87k0rzd46g.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <20210126150026.4d5e0e96@lwn.net> <20210127105427.73ba70a2@lwn.net> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37714"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46116@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jonathan Corbet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 21:38:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZr-0009iN-RX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:38:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZq-0007AI-Ql for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZi-00078a-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZi-0003sH-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZi-0002cA-5M; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46116 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 46116-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46116.161177987510031 (code B ref 46116); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46116) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2021 20:37:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZb-0002bj-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:37:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mab.sdf.org ([205.166.94.33]:43192 helo=ma.sdf.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZY-0002bY-8e for 46116@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from akrl by ma.sdf.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rZW-0006ZX-Ed; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:37:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210127105427.73ba70a2@lwn.net> (Jonathan Corbet's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:54:27 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198718 Archived-At: Jonathan Corbet writes: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:29:30 +0000 > Andrea Corallo wrote: > >> > So... Through the process of brute-force debugging, I found that simply >> > pulling up a copy of gnus-sum.el and doing an eval-defun on >> > gnus-summary-goto-subject makes the problem mysteriously go away. This, >> > in turn, makes me suspect that the native compilation is the real problem, >> > and this is not a gnus issue at all. Will try to pursue further; >> > apologies for wasting your time. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > jon >> >> This is a possible miscommunication. Could you report the input of the >> function when the miss-behave is observed? > > Trying to determine that was how I found the workaround - putting in a > (message) call made the problem go away. The call, though, is from > gnus-summary-mark-article: Perhaps you can put the print just before the call instead of inside, this will not effect the function we are interested. >> (when (gnus-summary-goto-subject article nil t) >> (let ((inhibit-read-only t)) >> (gnus-summary-show-thread) >> ;; Fix the mark. >> (gnus-summary-update-mark mark 'unread) >> t)))))) > > I was able to examine the arguments before the call; "article" is an > integer article number, as expected. Do we have a self contained reproducer I can look into? Thanks for the investigation Andrea