From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45056: 28.0.50; lexical-let doesn't work with returned closures on nativecomp Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:21:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87h7p05dax.fsf@everybody.org> <216496280.161579.1607203268073.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <1009119049.161679.1607205441220.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <119793380.161961.1607214402491.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <87v9deiuaf.fsf@everybody.org> <87h7ow2vj3.fsf@everybody.org> <87pn3kgh81.fsf@everybody.org> <87lfe8gejn.fsf@everybody.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12586"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 45056-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Mark A. Hershberger" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 23:24:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlPE-0003Cd-TY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 23:24:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlPD-0008Jv-Nq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlMx-0006Or-W2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:22:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlMw-0000jC-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlMw-0005Dm-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:22:02 -0500 Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 45056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 45056@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org, mah@everybody.org Original-Received: via spool by 45056-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45056.160746607720003 (code D ref 45056); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45056-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 22:21:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlMC-0005CZ-Vl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:55877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlMB-0005CR-D4 for 45056-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0B8MLEqt003200; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 22:21:14 GMT In-Reply-To: <87lfe8gejn.fsf@everybody.org> (Mark A. Hershberger's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:42:52 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195447 Archived-At: "Mark A. Hershberger" writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> My suggestion would be to close this bug an open a new dedicated one >> when we a get a reproducer to investigate on? > > That's fine. This can be closed. Closing then. Thanks for investigating this. Andrea