From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46670: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] possible miscompilation affecting lsp-mode Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:42:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a6ry46uc.fsf@collares.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12693"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46670@debbugs.gnu.org, Mauricio Collares To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 10:43:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqhP-0003DM-L3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:43:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34164 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqhO-0000XQ-MP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqhD-0000X8-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqhC-0003m1-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqhB-0002I5-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46670 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46670-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46670.16141597678784 (code B ref 46670); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 09:42:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqgx-0002Hc-Ff for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:60009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqgv-0002HS-6j for 46670@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11O9gduF014254 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:42:40 GMT In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:28:39 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200710 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:04 AM Andrea Corallo wrote: >> Pip Cet writes: >> >> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:36 PM Andrea Corallo wrote: >> >> Pip Cet writes: >> >> > Is this one of them, or am I confused? >> >> >> >> What's suspitions with that? At present I'm admittedly quite done but >> >> it looks okay to me. >> > >> > We're emitting >> > >> > (assume ,lhs (and ,lhs ,rhs)) >> > >> > even when NEGATED is t. >> >> Nope, when NEGATED is t the complete sequence we are emitting is (see >> line just following your diff hunk): >> >> (assume tmp-mvar (not rhs)) > > But tmp-mvar is in the same slot as RHS. > >> (assume lhs (and lhs tmp-mvar)) > > So this is equivalent (after the next SSA rename) to > > (assume lhs (and lhs rhs)) No sorry, after renaming this will be: (assume rhs_2 (not rhs_1)) (assume lhs_2 (and lhs_1 rhs_2)) or if we prefer from an real dump: (assume #(mvar 22593374 2 (not (integer 3 3))) (not #(mvar 22590962 2 (integer 3 3)))) (assume #(mvar 22593448 0 (or marker number)) (and #(mvar 22591258 0 (or marker number)) #(mvar 22593374 2 (not (integer 3 3))))) Sorry my development time budget for this week has been almost entirely consumed now, I'll try to come back on your many mails but I have other duties in line. Andrea