From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where is the eln search path defined Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 14:26:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87v9kxd18j.fsf@linaro.org> <873681cdzc.fsf@linaro.org> <87sgg0c2ve.fsf@linaro.org> <87h7we9680.fsf@linaro.org> <87eeri8y4r.fsf@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="85711"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 16:26:44 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jaKFY-000MBa-2o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 16:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaKFX-0006TD-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:26:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaKF6-00062q-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:50124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaKF4-0001Sg-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 04HEQB6V021276 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 17 May 2020 14:26:12 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 04HEQBW8007567; Sun, 17 May 2020 14:26:11 GMT In-Reply-To: <87eeri8y4r.fsf@linaro.org> ("Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e=22's?= message of "Sun, 17 May 2020 14:55:00 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.20; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/17 08:42:52 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250605 Archived-At: Alex Benn=C3=A9e writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> Alex Benn=C3=A9e writes: >> >>> Heh - so I patched pdumper to dump the variables at that point and >>> re-built: >>> >>> dump_do_dump_relocation: installation_state:2 ivoncation_dir: >>> >>> and now the built emacs boots up fine. So I'm guessing there >>> must have been a stale pdumper.o that didn't get built for some reason. >>> >>> Sorry for the noise. >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> no issue. Is very good somebody tests Aarch64, thanks for that! > > While on that subject is there any sort of benchmarking used to see if a > given arch is generating good code? Certainly on x86 I noticed a > speed-up in gnus but that is more subjective than objective. Hi Alex, I believe so far what we have is this: https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/elisp-benchmarks.html Note that you have to native compile by hand the tests because this package doesn't know about native compilation. Bests Andrea --=20 akrl@sdf.org