From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33840"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 17:50:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leJmx-0008gj-If for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 17:50:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53090 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJmw-0005vY-Kd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJjq-0002sh-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJjq-00073R-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJjq-0002wY-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48221.16202295668629 (code B ref 48221); Wed, 05 May 2021 15:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:46:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJiw-0002Eq-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:49873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJiu-0002C8-6i for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145Fk2qj019390 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:46:02 GMT In-Reply-To: <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 17:31:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205719 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >>>> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >>> >>> Sorry, I meant native-compile. >> >> NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use >> this? > > "native-compilation" is a handful... would it make sense to change that > to "--with-native-compile" instead? (I don't really have an opinion > here, though.) FWIW I've really no preference here, I was asked for "--with-native-compilation", as long as we decide something it's all good by me. Andrea