From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On elisp running native Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83zhgeoh0k.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2vyo55n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="102286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (berkeley-unix) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 29 22:19:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ianfL-000QR3-Ls for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 22:19:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ianfK-0001qy-EF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ianey-0001qr-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ianeu-0002D8-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:54872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ianet-0001n5-CY; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:18:35 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:akrl@sverige.freeshell.org [205.166.94.5]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id xATLIWWl028805 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:18:32 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id xATLIWJc017560; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:18:32 GMT In-Reply-To: <83y2vyo55n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:26:28 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242898 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:43:21 +0000 >> >> (mapc #'byte-compile-file (directory-files "~/emacs/lisp" t "el$")) >> >> Then is one single start of the GUI for all compilations. >> >> I see an intense message activity going on in the mini-buffer so maybe >> that's the reason? >> >> Question how could I delete the compilation log without interrupting the >> compilation it-self? > > How about binding inhibit-message to a non-nil value, around that mapc > call? > Great, doing that we are straight down into the 15s territory, exactly as the measured batch. I guess this explains. Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org