From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41321: 27.0.91; Emacs aborts due to invalid pseudovector objects Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:40:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83zha8cgpi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1vibmyj.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgublku.fsf@gnu.org> <831rncjuwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv082mm1.fsf@gnu.org> <83lflk2l07.fsf@gnu.org> <83blmg2ggi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="38250"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41321@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Pip Cet To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 22 16:41:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8rG-0009p0-KP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:41:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8rF-0000Hj-Jh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8r8-0000CR-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8r8-0003WN-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8r8-0001rr-DA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41321.15901584107109 (code B ref 41321); Fri, 22 May 2020 14:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2020 14:40:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8qI-0001qb-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:64235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8qF-0001qM-2K for 41321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 04MEe5MD000016 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 22 May 2020 14:40:06 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 04MEe5L7018251; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:40:05 GMT In-Reply-To: <83blmg2ggi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 May 2020 17:26:53 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180773 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Pip Cet >> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:04:03 +0000 >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , 41321@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> I don't think posting the disassembled code for >> `signal_before_change' can hurt, since there's no easy way for >> anyone else to reproduce it. > > I see this on two different systems where Emacs was compiled with two > different versions of GCC. So if you want to see the disassembly, any > 32-bit GCC will do, I think. I believe the triplet can make a difference given the calling convention can change no? Also CFLAGS are clearly a factor. -- akrl@sdf.org