From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On elisp running native Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 18:49:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <74dd94a9-28cb-a5fd-dbc7-ab21009834ad@cs.ucla.edu> <87v9nj6fcl.fsf@gmx.de> <8736amwq98.fsf@gmx.de> <87r1y4ttti.fsf@gmx.de> <8736akbiy5.fsf@gmx.de> <87y2sca2ex.fsf@gmx.de> <87k13w9hf0.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="87667"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 07 19:50:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jAeWj-000MiH-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 19:50:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51784 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAeWi-00007v-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAeWE-000879-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAeWD-000729-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:64774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAeWD-0006y4-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:49:49 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 027InhpD014890 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 7 Mar 2020 18:49:43 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 027IngVl019252; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 18:49:42 GMT In-Reply-To: <87k13w9hf0.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sat, 07 Mar 2020 18:57:39 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245325 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> Hi Michael, > > Hi Andrea, > > [re-adding emacs-devel@gnu.org] > >> so apparently it works but as expected we got time out: >> >> https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/-/jobs/5172 > > Yes, we have set the project-specific timeout to 90m. We shouldn't > change it, because the jobs hang sometimes. > >> I think we should raise the project time-out >> >> https://emba.gnu.org/help/ci/runners/README.html#setting-maximum-job-timeout-for-a-runner >> >> that's apparently the upperbound that can then limited afterwards for >> each "Runner" (thing I still have to totally understand what it is :) >> >> what do you think about? > > I believe the better approach is to set the timeout on job-level for > your test. See . Thanks I can push a commit to do that. What about adding also -j2 in the make? Testing the parallel build is good plus I suspect giving a little more steam to the process would help. Regards Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org