From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58318: 28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with MinGW Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:28:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <835ygxsdyu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zge9w049.fsf@gnus.org> <83k05dovwq.fsf@gnu.org> <87a667x3l4.fsf@gnus.org> <83edvjondh.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfjzvnyu.fsf@gnus.org> <837d1bomsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn9bn69q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tu4fn3rz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0zjn31y.fsf@gnu.org> <83a667mook.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38827"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, Corwin Brust , 58318@debbugs.gnu.org, bartosz.bubak@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 15:29:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9tD-0009x1-Sq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:29:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34536 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9tC-0004kZ-L0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9t0-0004jz-At for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9t0-0000cI-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9sz-0002U4-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58318 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58318-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58318.16652356929478 (code B ref 58318); Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2022 13:28:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9sC-0002So-A4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:55529) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9s8-0002Se-23 for 58318@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 298DS0TU017890 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 8 Oct 2022 13:28:01 GMT In-Reply-To: <83a667mook.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2022 22:14:19 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244908 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Corwin Brust >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 10:52:04 -0500 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, bartosz.bubak@gmail.com, >> 58318@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:35 AM Andrea Corallo wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > OK, then let's go for precompiling all the trampolines AOT. >> > >> > The only downside might be build time, compiling a trampoline is quick, >> > 1000+ maybe not so much. >> > >> >> If this will mostly affect those building Windows binaries *for >> redistribution*, perhaps it's not a big problem? Based on my own very >> limited testing, it's fine for me. > > Right, so I think we need a special Makefile target to produce those > compiled trampolines (something like "make trampolines"), and that > target should be only used manually when building a binary > distribution, not when building the release tarball for use on the > same machine where it is built. > > Andrea, could you please come up with a patch for that? Thanks. Right, will do. Andrea