From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging native-comp and pgtk Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:32:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87czx7ycva.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eehmyalr.fsf@gmail.com> <877dneoewi.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z2yy6z7.fsf@gmail.com> <878s7twq2t.fsf@gmail.com> <84adc238-c424-bb6b-da28-c4232172da5b@gmx.at> <87wnvcrze8.fsf@gnus.org> <87eehkfbab.fsf@gnu.org> <878s7sqiww.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 20:33:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBN9a-00095V-BP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:33:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBN9Z-0003oz-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:33:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBN86-0002qd-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:32:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:60588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBN85-0001j7-9r; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:32:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11EJWNJM027012 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:32:23 GMT In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:23:09 -0600") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264771 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >>> The drawback is that we get compilation warnings pop up every now and >>> then, which is arguably somewhat disruptive. But this could be improved >>> upon, I think. For example, I'm not sure users need to see all warnings >>> by default for installed packages even in the byte-compilation case. We >>> could perhaps have an option to enable these warnings for the genuine >>> sticklers out there. (I for one would definitely turn it on...) >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >> we have the `comp-async-report-warnings-errors' customize to control >> this. > > Should that perhaps default to nil? I'm not sure users typically need > to see these warnings -- developers do. In the past a lot of developers not seing these warnings on native-comp got hit by this. I think we touched on the reasons why hiding warnings on native-comp is dangerous here . So yeah I agree with you normal users are not interested, but developers should learn that this customize exists and set it to t, this is not 100% trivial. Anyway I guess as every default the best value is very debatable :) Andrea