From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:30:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> <83a6s49gki.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9486"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 17:59:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3h2-0002ON-JR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:59:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3h1-0004hZ-IF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3Fe-0008QE-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3Fe-0004lM-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3Fe-0003j9-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161349305314311 (code B ref 46495); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2021 16:30:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3FV-0003il-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:53207) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3FT-0003iZ-Jx for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:30:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11GGUkTm018835 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:30:47 GMT In-Reply-To: <83a6s49gki.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:29:33 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200132 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, >> 46495@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:34:49 +0000 >> >> Andy could you point out the two libgccjit versions you used specifying >> wich one was used in the successfull / failed experiment? > > Right, this is another potential reason for the difference. AFAIK, > MinGW64 uses GCC 10.x, whereas mingw.org uses 9.2. Hi Eli, I did some GCC debugging (the crash is there) using my reduced reproducer and clearly look (for my case at least) this is a libgccjit bug that we trigger only generating code for 32bit wide-int. GCC trunk is broken but as you've anticipated 9 is working (just finished an Emacs bootstrap). This evening I'll open a bug on the GCC bugzilla and link it here. Would be nice to fix it before the end of stage4... :/ Regards Andrea