From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native-comp-async-report-warnings-errors default value Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:29:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87h7dj7su7.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1cnlu6y.fsf@gnu.org> <87czo77rx7.fsf@gmail.com> <837dcmamt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83v90694ka.fsf@gnu.org> <83v901zdh6.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0g3cagl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40526"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 17:42:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzLkI-000AJ1-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:42:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzLkG-0002iS-Ke for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKMF-0008Lp-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:14:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKLj-0002PL-R4; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 1BK8Ts6B012420 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:29:54 GMT In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:07:07 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282514 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> When I said "by popular demand", I meant that. Just your own voice is >>> not enough, IMO. > > I have now reviewed this thread, and changing the default from nil to > silent has the support from Robert Pluim, Stefan Kangas, Lars > Ingebrigtsen, Andrea Corallo and =C3=93scar Fuentes (5). > > For keeping the current default I count Eli Zaretskii (1). > > Neutral in this thread are T.V. Raman and Stefan Monnier (2). FWIW please count me on the neutral side, I've no formed opinion on this ATM even if the more time is passing the more I tend to think that the current default might be safer and/or beneficial on the long run. Thanks Andrea