From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding is turned on in more use cases Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:49:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83o8t6bx2p.fsf@gnu.org> <83k13ubv3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83imjebsrh.fsf@gnu.org> <20200308193048.GB4832@ACM> <20200310191328.GB5046@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="10906"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 10 20:51:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jBku8-0002iQ-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:51:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBku7-0005AV-8r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBkt9-0004Dp-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBkt8-0002vG-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:51102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBkt8-0002jp-Dp; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 02AJnt8q027161 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:49:55 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 02AJnt0F001869; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:49:55 GMT In-Reply-To: <20200310191328.GB5046@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:13:28 +0000") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245447 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > What specific real problem does forcing M-: to use lexical binding > solve? My 2 cents are that it solves the problem of consistency if we assume lexical binding is going to be the default for the future. Indeed to become default it has to start somewhere. Regards Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org