From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On elisp running native Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 20:55:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87v9nj6fcl.fsf@gmx.de> <8736amwq98.fsf@gmx.de> <87r1y4ttti.fsf@gmx.de> <8736akbiy5.fsf@gmx.de> <87y2sca2ex.fsf@gmx.de> <87k13w9hf0.fsf@gmx.de> <875zfg9ert.fsf@gmx.de> <87sgiiy53f.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="38027"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 08 21:56:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jB2ye-0009n5-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:56:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jB2yd-0007wC-Uz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jB2xv-0007Uw-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jB2xt-00053Z-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:60773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jB2xt-00051F-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 028Ktu0l011461 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 8 Mar 2020 20:55:56 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 028KtuTg013518; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 20:55:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <87sgiiy53f.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:16:52 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245366 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > > Hi Andrea, Hi, >> Okay with speed 2 -j2 we've run out of memory on the VM in the middle of >> the compilation. > > Hmm. Maybe we shall run this only when no other job runs in parallel? > Resource groups > seem to do this. I think this would fix the memory issue but can we afford to keep the CI exclusively busy for so long? I fear speed 2 would take something close to one day in this setup. I propose to keep speed 0 there, is also useful because I always bootstrap but only speed 2. We could revisit the setup when we have a more affordable compile time for bootstrapping speed 2 also on small machines. What do you think? Regards Andrea PS I think ideally we should check all speed from 0 too 2 when/if will be possible. -- akrl@sdf.org