From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: :alnum: broken? Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:02:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86wo8flqct.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <3A14F30E-60EF-4C99-AC1A-9A1B2539169B@acm.org> <837e07gmka.fsf@gnu.org> <1c654ac9-10a2-4e5d-f77c-3b78bb580ffc@cs.ucla.edu> <83v9nqg8la.fsf@gnu.org> <298a093f-6eed-3a9f-99cf-bd17b9cb61f0@cs.ucla.edu> <83blpifp95.fsf@gnu.org> <81bfdae0-9fe1-f173-adb1-b5fe2ba2b808@cs.ucla.edu> <834kvafnwk.fsf@gnu.org> <8DA6D8F4-921B-4FB8-A7A3-CE75B10CE668@acm.org> <83zhd2e6h6.fsf@gnu.org> <87k14547u7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ftet3xo4.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ftetqbi9.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="112784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 01 00:03:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j8B8o-000TFT-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:03:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8B8n-0004cd-Ft for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8B8A-0004AO-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:02:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8B87-00040g-Ql for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:02:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:57332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8B87-0003zL-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:02:43 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 01TN2cpB021212 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:02:38 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 01TN2ch6011263; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:02:38 GMT In-Reply-To: <87ftetqbi9.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:22:54 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245133 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski writes: > +1. I consider myself fairly proficient in Elisp; I authored quitee > a few packages, some of them distributed on Github, some of them for > private use for a few people. I admit that even that I know about > compiler warnings, I never got into a habit of compiling my files. (I > know I should, but consider me as a datapoint suggesting that compiler > warnings are not enough.) > > My 2 cents. My experience is quite the opposite. I can't imagine my self writing large non trivial Elisp and going for a first run without double checking against the byte-compiler output. I agree in that respect that, given the cheap cpu time involved in the byte-compilation process, we should move towards using this as default. Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org