From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47868: 28.0.50; [native-comp] vertico package doesn't work when loading the corresponding eln file Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:31:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87czuryggn.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87zgxsfvkt.fsf@miha-pc> <1b1cc5cb-0656-45b5-258d-7c16322eb7f6@daniel-mendler.de> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29689"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47868@debbugs.gnu.org, jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no, tsdh@gnu.org To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 21 10:33:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8IK-0007b7-L7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:33:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8IJ-0006AF-Mx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8IA-00066n-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8I9-0002tn-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8I9-0005c1-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47868 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47868-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47868.161899392821501 (code B ref 47868); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47868) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2021 08:32:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8HH-0005aj-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ8HF-0005aZ-SX for 47868@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 13L8Vtsg011364 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:31:55 GMT In-Reply-To: <1b1cc5cb-0656-45b5-258d-7c16322eb7f6@daniel-mendler.de> (Daniel Mendler's message of "Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:05:21 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204586 Archived-At: Daniel Mendler writes: > On 4/21/21 9:58 AM, Andrea Corallo wrote: >> Yes, the reason is that we hash cons all immediates using equal has test >> function, but this does not distinguish string with different >> properties. I'm working on the best fix here. >> I'll merge 47922 with this bug. > > Is it uncommon to use propertized string literals, since these were > the ones which introduced the issue here? (No coincidence that two > packages of mine were affected by this) Yes it is uncommon but still this is a native compiler bug as the byte compiler hash cons string correctly. Andrea