From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 289000e: Merge branch 'feature/native-comp' into trunk Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:16:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210425182503.25223.81072@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210425182508.6CC7C2094D@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <96bce26e-e0e6-2d54-2dc8-6281a56a2251@gmail.com> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8731"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 26 18:18:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb3wU-0001yP-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:18:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lb3wS-0004Ul-Rk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:18:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lb3uO-0002lE-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:50807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lb3uM-0007eG-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 13QGGOcc013648 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:16:24 GMT In-Reply-To: <96bce26e-e0e6-2d54-2dc8-6281a56a2251@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel"'s message of "Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:57:22 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268485 Archived-At: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit-Claudel writes: > On 4/25/21 2:36 PM, Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions. wro= te: >> I guess you get what this mail is about from the subject :) > > Congratulations! > > Is there a simple way to measure performance of native-compiled vs. byte-= compiled code? Something like benchmark-run-compiled, but for native code,= maybe? No we have no precooked way for that, but I'm wondering how much is it interesting to test one single function. The performance will most likely depend on the surrounding set of used libraries (read all Emacs) and if this is native compiled or not. Regards Andrea