From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:55:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x6u9o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzesrku.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupms4mp.fsf@gnu.org> <83eegpspjk.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kpr03h.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtvdqt53.fsf@gnu.org> <83blbsqyea.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35220"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, pipcet@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 09 16:27:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJeGY-00092Z-Og for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:27:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36174 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJeGX-0006u5-JP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJdmF-0002wi-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJdmE-00020r-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJdmE-00078w-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161530174627451 (code B ref 46256); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2021 14:55:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJdlx-00078h-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:57617) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJdlt-00078Z-Ki for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 129Ete2Y003669 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:55:40 GMT In-Reply-To: <83blbsqyea.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:55:57 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201916 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com >> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:03:01 +0000 >> >> > Can you tell why are we loading the same .eln files more than once? >> >> I guess `load' was called two times on the same filename. > > Is this likely to happen? Our code generally uses 'require', which > should avoid that. cc-*.el files for instance have more than one direct call to load. IIRC one of the analyzed cases was cc-mode related (certanly one I observed). >> > What are the reasons for unloading a .eln file which was once loaded >> > into a session? >> >> All the functions defined in it are not anymore reachable (read all >> symbols functions are makunbound or defined to some other function). > > That means someone did unload-feature, right? Also loading for example a new version freshly compiled of the same file should present the same scenario. Thanks Andrea