Re: Eager garbage collection

[Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> The devil, as usually, is in the details.  What is radically different
> between the two is the value of X1.  In the gcmh.el case, the value of
> X1 is alarmingly large, something I keep warning people against for a
> long time.  I don't want us to adopt such dangerous practices.  And
> using that large value is central to the idea of gcmh.el, so if we
> lower it significantly, I wouldn't expect it to provide significant
> benefits.

I see, I was discussing the implementations rather than the defaults.
Indeed these are easy to change to what we think is suitable for going
into master.

  Andrea