From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44743: native-comp: confirm-exit-emacs warns about active processes when compiling Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:29:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83y2iwz2eq.fsf@gnu.org> <87eekj8a4t.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn42u5fz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30021"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 44743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:37:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khbJp-0007hQ-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:37:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khbJo-0005mk-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:37:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khbDc-0007Rh-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:31:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khbDa-0002pX-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khbDa-0007lE-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44743.160623540226072 (code B ref 44743); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2020 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khbCb-0006m8-Mv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52651) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khbCa-0006lZ-1D for 44743@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:30:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0AOGTwAK012978; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:29:58 GMT In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:08:15 -0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194088 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >>> Cc: Andrea Corallo , stefan@marxist.se, 44743@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:52:18 +0100 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>> >>> > FWIW, I think this should be controlled by a user option. It is not >>> > at all obvious that everyone would like compilation processes to be >>> > killed automatically, people might want to wait for them to complete. >>> >>> Since this is something that Emacs does automatically, in the >>> background, I don't think a user option sounds like something somebody >>> would want to tweak. >> >> IMO, we should offer an option precisely _because_ this is in >> background, thus the user could be unaware of the compilation being >> run. Since compilation takes non-negligible time, I envision users >> who'd like to wait for a few moments if that gave them faster Lisp >> next time. >> >> This is not unlike background subprocesses about which we do ask on >> exit. > > IIUC, it's different from other background processes. The compilation > will resume automatically the next time that file is loaded in > subsequent invocations of Emacs. Yes but you will loose the machine time invested into the compilation that was aborted :) I guess 99% of people wouldn't care about it but OTOH what's the downside of leaving a customize to control it? Andrea