From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ediff maximum line length? Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:00:46 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297501331 26459 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2011 09:02:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 12 10:02:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoBMM-0007SL-EE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:01:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41204 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoBML-0003ky-6l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50950 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoBMF-0003ka-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoBME-00032H-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from igloo.linux.gr ([62.1.205.36]:33074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoBMD-00031U-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:01:34 -0500 X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: p1C90vu4005011 Original-Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr (207.47.25.82.static.nextweb.net [207.47.25.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id p1C90vu4005011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:01:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 62.1.205.36 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135934 Archived-At: On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas writes: >>On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:27:26 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> diff-mode is not a replacement for ediff in that it only helps you >>> read contextual diffs (i.e. the output of `diff' or other tools that >>> output in the same format). So, if you do >>> >>> exec emacs --eval "(diff \"$1\" \"$2\")" >>> >>> the resulting *diff* buffer will be in diff-mode. >> >> Without fine diff highlighting though. > > Anything wrong with diff-refine-hunk? Now that I've modified the shell wrapper to `diff -u' first, that should work too. Thanks! :-)