From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable? Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:46:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231645635 8616 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2009 03:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 11 04:48:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LLrJF-0007qI-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:48:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54566 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrHz-0001Js-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrHu-0001Jn-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrHs-0001Jb-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40250 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrHs-0001JY-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:58847) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLrHr-0000Ny-Dv; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:46:55 -0500 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from [121.207.29.235] (port=46686 helo=localhost) by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1LLrHp-00020S-ND (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:46:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:33:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107773 Archived-At: On 2009-01-10 20:33 +0000, Richard M Stallman wrote: > It is a tex file something like this: > > \define@key{codeexample}{vbox}[]{\def\code@pre{\vbox\bgroup\setlength{\hsize}{\linewidth-6pt}}\def\code@post{\egroup}} > > For that file, Emacs should use TeX mode, not Text mode. Does it? It seems it is derived from text-mode at least for the one in AUCTEX. Best, Leo