From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bad default faces now Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:44:29 +0000 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269261907 28109 80.91.229.12 (22 Mar 2010 12:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:45:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 13:45:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nth08-0001FL-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:45:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nth07-0007No-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:44:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nth01-0007NS-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38259 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nth00-0007NF-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:44:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntgzy-0005rX-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntgzy-0005rK-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntgzs-00017B-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:44:44 +0100 Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:44:44 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:44:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fI4lw2HwTaJtWE43xUvmX68IQWw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122464 Archived-At: On 2010-03-22 11:19 +0000, Lennart Borgman wrote: > I made an elisp file to help testing new colors. It is available here: > > http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/font-lock-color-test.el > > I think the idea of inviting someone to create new suggestions for > colors is good. Could we please then add them to the test file above > so people can test? Thanks for this. I just run it to see the suggestions. I guess colours look different on different types of screens. I think the problem with chong1 on my LCD is keyword and doc-string are too much alike. Doc string stands out a bit too much. Leo