From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Guile in Emacs Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:38:29 +0100 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <3vsk8ecg6a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <873a0euot4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873a0cyv3r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87aauiho3y.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <1271028837.6164.55.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <1271102739.6067.38.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <8039yz34ka.fsf@tiny.isode.net> <1271173887.6067.53.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <87ljcqqxoc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271327935 20126 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2010 10:38:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:38:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 12:38:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2MTE-0001AM-Ld for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42983 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2MTE-0006Qn-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2MT6-0006Ow-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55817 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2MT4-0006Mv-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2MT1-0006BF-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:38:41 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2MT1-0006Au-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:38:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2MSy-00015e-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:QcXDPBPMMj6d4z+Rr3U9KPQQ8wY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123699 Archived-At: On 2010-04-14 16:47 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > While I rather like CL, and much prefer it to Scheme, I don't see why > we need to consider either. I don't see much wrong with elisp as it > is. In my view it simply is not among the major limiting factors of > Emacs. Keep elisp but extend it with some goodies from common lisp or scheme sounds good to me. Leo