From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.60; gs.el - This code is experimental. Don't use it. Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:51:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87iqps29hf.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87priv5m8f.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231645925 9213 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2009 03:52:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1524@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 11 04:53:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LLrNz-000087-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:53:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44948 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrMj-0002Wo-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:51:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrMe-0002VK-Hz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrMZ-0002UM-Ht for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58221 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLrMZ-0002UJ-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:51:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:57609) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLrMZ-0001Qc-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:51:47 -0500 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from [121.207.29.235] (port=46753 helo=localhost) by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1LLrMV-0002lJ-PR (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:51:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87priv5m8f.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:22:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107774 Archived-At: On 2009-01-10 13:22 +0000, Chong Yidong wrote: > Leo writes: > >> I think it is safe to remove (info "(elisp)PostScript Images") and >> gs.el now that over a month has passed. > > It's used in image.c. We should probably try to fix it if it doesn't > work properly. I don't use it so I don't know whether it has bugs. I suspect it has. But I'm mostly concerned by the comment in the source which advise users not to use it. Best, Leo