From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:10:22 +0100 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: <200908032029.n73KTi9h017528@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249405855 6324 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2009 17:10:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:10:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 19:10:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYNXD-0007Hj-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:10:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNXD-0002aG-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNX8-0002aB-I8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNX3-0002Yn-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45109 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNX3-0002Yk-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:56686 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MYNX2-0008IQ-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:10:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNWx-0004jh-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:10:33 +0000 Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:10:31 +0000 Original-Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:10:31 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:02q4HqIUEIXz9kBU30XCd820aTQ= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113668 Archived-At: On 2009-08-03 21:29 +0100, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > It can be seen that 23.1 is quite a bit slower, and that it has a lot > of extra calls to char_table_ref. Are those calls necessary? Thank you for the quantitative results. From experience, there is slowdown in Emacs 23. -- Leo's Emacs uptime: 17 hours, 6 minutes, 51 seconds