From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:00:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Leo , 4440@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254318651 6601 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2009 13:50:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4440@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 30 15:50:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MszZk-0005fK-Fg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:50:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MszZi-0005dB-11 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MswP0-0006ak-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MswOv-0006ZN-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58958 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MswOu-0006Z4-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:37201) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MswOt-0006i1-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8UAR75V018964; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:27:07 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8UAA6VK016503; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:10:06 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:10:06 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: "Leo, Shidai Liu" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:10:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4440 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4440-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4440.125430483514653 (code B ref 4440); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4440) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Sep 2009 10:00:35 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8UA0XMY014649 for <4440@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:00:34 -0700 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]:53886) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1Msvz6-0003xj-Ha (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:00:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:42:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:27:17 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:31596 Archived-At: On 2009-09-25 12:42 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo wrote: > >> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions >> while .dx32fsl is not. >> >> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl=B9. So I'd propose to add it >> to the list. > > Apparently, OpenMCL / Clozure uses different extensions for fasl > according to target architecture: > > http://ccl.clozure.com/ccl-documentation.html#building-definitions > > The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too > much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used? > > Juanma > > Index: lisp/bindings.el > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/bindings.el,v > retrieving revision 1.225 > diff -u -2 -r1.225 bindings.el > --- lisp/bindings.el 14 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0000 1.225 > +++ lisp/bindings.el 22 Sep 2009 13:43:44 -0000 > @@ -602,7 +602,10 @@ > ;; CMUCL > ".x86f" ".sparcf" > - ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks, OpenMCL) > - ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" ".pfsl" ".dfsl" > - ".p64fsl" ".d64fsl" ".dx64fsl" > + ;; OpenMCL / Clozure CL > + ".dfsl" ".pfsl" ".d64fsl" ".p64fsl" ".lx64fsl" ".lx32fsl" > + ".dx64fsl" ".dx32fsl" ".fx64fsl" ".fx32fsl" ".sx64fsl" > + ".sx32fsl" ".wx64fsl" ".wx32fsl" > + ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks) > + ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" > ;; Libtool > ".lo" ".la" Many thanks for investigating this further. Unfortunately I am not too familiar with ccl. I changed from sbcl to ccl because threads are better supported in ccl on OSX. Could you ask in gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel? Leo