From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-file to trash Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:02:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hmvxyuv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hblz1hxi.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w7amchf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274709772 29064 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2010 14:02:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 16:02:51 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGYEx-0001h1-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:02:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58032 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGYEw-0003z9-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38341 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGYEn-0003x2-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGYEl-0006zL-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.131]:47964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGYEl-0006zA-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:02:35 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]:50323) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1OGYEj-000454-9i (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Mon, 24 May 2010 15:02:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:44 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125168 Archived-At: On 2010-05-24 14:16 +0100, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Yeah, there are commands (e.g. shell-command-on-region and clone-buffer) >> for which an omitted prefix argument means t. I was hoping we could > > Yes, it's even the recommended way to detect interactive calls (as > explained in the docstring of called-interactively-p): I have modified my local emacs-23 branch according to this discussion. It's been working great. I have only found two additional changes namely dired and eshell: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/217693. Thanks. Leo