From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete? Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:41:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229794888 23482 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2008 17:41:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 20 18:42:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LE5qT-0000b7-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:42:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LE5pH-0007ZP-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LE5pD-0007ZC-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LE5pA-0007Yw-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42916 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LE5pA-0007Yt-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:44894) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LE5pA-0007ch-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:12 -0500 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]:35865) by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1LE5p8-00050B-N6 (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:41:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107129 Archived-At: On 2008-12-09 21:00 +0000, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete? > > I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of > PGG author(s) and users. Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete? There seems to be no objections. Shall we go ahead marking it obsolete? > > > Stefan -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.