From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rcirc: Too many default keybindings for rcirc-next-active-buffer Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0908170940u79896ab7lba193bd052c7194@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250542007 25566 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2009 20:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 17 22:46:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Md96G-0002dO-5C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:46:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53106 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md96F-0007Ua-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md951-0006rj-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md94x-0006pW-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45077 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md94x-0006pT-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.131]:39939) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Md94x-0005iU-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:19 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]:49780) by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1Md94w-0002f7-4u (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:45:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:45:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114353 Archived-At: On 2009-08-17 20:45 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Leo writes: > >> I have raised this issue a few months ago but nothing happened. So I >> deleted C-c ` in rcirc and recompiled it. But I have to remember to do >> that every time I upgrade Emacs. > > A perfect application for eval-after-load. :-) Certainly. I have already 15 e-a-l in my .emacs and it is overkill for things like this. > Andreas. -- Leo's Emacs uptime: 13 days, 20 hours, 40 minutes, 59 seconds