From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5550: 23.1.92; bookmark stops relocating Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:57:57 +0000 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: <87vde64yqk.fsf@tux.homenetwork> <87r5ou4qq5.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265718150 27354 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2010 12:22:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:22:30 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 13:22:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nep6p-0002ez-Jl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:22:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nep6o-0008RW-LS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:22:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nep6k-0008RA-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52146 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nep6k-0008Qw-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nep6i-0001eN-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57096) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nep6h-0001Zi-9L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:22:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NeokA-0004Ke-Gq; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5550 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.126571671016630 (code B ref -1); Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2010 11:58:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Neoje-0004KB-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Neojc-0004K6-Oa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:33856) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojX-000161-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojW-0004wq-40 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:34096) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojV-0004wg-US for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NeojV-0000l2-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49380 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NeojV-0000kr-9M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojT-0004wG-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:42810) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojT-0004wA-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:58:19 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NeojR-0005Kg-NG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:58:17 +0100 Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:58:17 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:58:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W9cAGbz1sirUti8FhaxA4Wjgbto= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:59:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34975 Archived-At: On 2010-02-09 11:02 +0000, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > Leo writes: > >> On 2010-02-09 08:09 +0000, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >>> - (list* "" `(buffer . ,buf) (bookmark-get-bookmark-record bmk))))) >>> + `("" (buffer . ,buf) . ,(bookmark-get-bookmark-record bookmark))))) >> >> Is bookmark a typo for bmk here? > Yes thanks. ;-) > Apply patch on top of precedents ones. Thanks. Leo