From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell compatibility Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:31:16 +0000 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: <87r5rpb66l.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259062324 17027 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2009 11:32:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:32:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:31:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCtcj-00006D-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:31:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCtci-00013w-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:31:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCtcZ-00012m-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:31:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCtcU-00011x-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:31:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50100 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCtcU-00011u-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:31:42 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54740) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCtcT-0001Tv-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:31:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NCtcQ-0008Ox-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:31:38 +0100 Original-Received: from soup.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:31:37 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by soup.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:31:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: soup.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7IrCt+bKbIOgZplnu7miUZxR4y8= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117670 Archived-At: On 2009-11-23 16:47 +0000, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Eshell contains a lot of compatibility code. Does it mean, eshell is >> still synchronized upstream, and I must add compatibility code as well? >> Or could I trust, that the version in trunk is used in GNU Emacs 23, and >> anybody moving it out must add compatibility code herself? > > I don't think there's any kind of "upstream" version of Eshell > any more. In any case I wouldn't worry about it. Eshell has a git repo here: http://github.com/jwiegley/eshell. > > > Stefan Leo